The Global Alliance for Historical Truth (GAHT) Official HP (歴史の真実を求める世界連合会 日本語公式HPリンク)
Litigation Documents (Petitions, judgements, etc.)
Litigation GAHT contests the City of Glendale firstly in the Federale Court and later in the Court of California too. GAHT seeks injunctive and declaratory relief relating to the presence of a monument authorized by the city of Glendale and condemning the nation of Japan for its involvement with and treatment of what have come to be known as “comfort women.” The monument is located on public land in a publicly owned park in Glendale known as Central Park. GAHT seeks this relief on the grounds that the Public Monument exceeds the power of Glendale, infringes upon the federal government’s power to exclusively conduct the foreign affairs of the United States, and violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. GAHT also insists that the Public Monument threatens to negatively affect U.S. foreign relations with Japan, one of this nation's most important allies, and is inconsistent with the foreign policy of the United States.
Year Month/Day Document No. T i t l e Fedral Court California Court 2014 Feb. 20 Case No. 2:14-cv-1291 Document 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ○ - Aug. 4 Document 47 CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL ○ - Aug. 4 Document 48 JUDGEMENT ○ - Sept. 3 - COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR VIOLATION OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE - ○ Sept. 4 Document 49 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT: AND REPRESENTATION STATEMENT ○ - Sept. 18 Case No. BC556600 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR (1)VIOLATION OF THE GLENDALE MUNICIPAL CODE (2)VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION (3)VIOLATION OF THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION - ○ 2015 Jan. 7 Case No. BC556600 Tentative Ruling - ○ Jan. 28 Case No.BC556600 PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 425.16 - ○ Feb. 23 Case No.BC556600 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS’ OPENING BRIEF - ○ Feb. 23 Case No.BC556600 PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S EVIDENCE SUBMITTED WITH DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 425.16 - ○ Mar. 13 Case: 14-56440, ID: 9456412 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS’ OPENING BRIEF ○ - May 13 ID: 9536959 APPELLEE’S ANSWERING BRIEF - - May 27 ID: 9551617 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF ○ - Aug. 25 Case No.BC556600 GRANT DEFENDANT'S SPECIAL MOTION - ○ 2016 Aug. 4 Case:14-56440, ID:10075150 Opinion(Judgement) 〇 - Sept. 16 Case:14-56440, ID:10125962 PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC 〇 - Oct. 4 Case:14-56440, ID:10137885 Amicus Curiae Brief of KINGEN 〇 - Oct. 4 Case:14-56440, ID:10137893 Amicus Curiae Brief of SDHF 〇 - Oct. 13 Case:14-56440, ID:10158018 Order Denying Petition for Rehearing 〇 - 2017 Jan. 10 Case:16-917 Petition For Writ of Certiorari 〇 - Feb. 22 Case:16-917 Glendale city, Brief in Opposition 〇 - Feb. 22 Case:16-917 Brief for the Government of Japan as Amicus Curiae 〇 - Feb. 22 Case:16-917 Brief of the Government of Japan (Excerpt and Explanation) 〇 - Feb. 22 Case:16-917 KINGEN & SDHF Joint Brief of Amicus Curiae 〇 - Mar. 10 Case:16-917 Reply Brief of Petitioners 〇 -
index about GAHT News Litigation Contribution Link Related Information